Which option best describes how structured peer mediation sessions are commonly concluded after dispute resolution?

Which option best describes how structured peer mediation sessions are commonly concluded after dispute resolution?

• A. Drafting a formal report to administration
• B. Rehashing the dispute without documentation
• C. Scheduling another group activity
• D. Developing a written agreement that summarizes the solution to the conflict

Answer: (D)

Concluding a structured peer mediation session typically involves developing a written agreement that summarizes the solution to the conflict. This document records exactly what was agreed, including the commitments each person will make, who is responsible for next steps, and any timelines or check-ins. Having this written agreement helps prevent misunderstanding, holds both parties accountable, and serves as a reference if concerns arise later. Simply rehashing the dispute without documentation leaves details fuzzy and undermines accountability. While programs might share notes with staff or schedule follow-up activities, the standard wrap-up between the peers is to codify the resolution in writing.

Concluding a structured peer mediation session typically involves developing a written agreement that summarizes the solution to the conflict. This document records exactly what was agreed, including the commitments each person will make, who is responsible for next steps, and any timelines or check-ins. Having this written agreement helps prevent misunderstanding, holds both parties accountable, and serves as a reference if concerns arise later. Simply rehashing the dispute without documentation leaves details fuzzy and undermines accountability. While programs might share notes with staff or schedule follow-up activities, the standard wrap-up between the peers is to codify the resolution in writing.